Results & analytics · model v2

Results · #1 Example: v2 quick demonstration (olive ground cover)

Model v2.0.0 Frontier protocol SYNTHETIC
Simulated participation of SYNTHETIC agents. "Participation" is the simulated seasonal decision to maintain inter-row ground cover; it is not observed adoption. No parameter is empirically calibrated. Intervals are 95% percentile-bootstrap intervals over 20 Monte Carlo repetitions: they describe simulation noise, not confidence about real programmes. Budget: uncapped (expenditure = sum of entitlements).

Primary comparison · equal actual expenditure C1 protocol

Each mechanism's outcome is interpolated linearly along its own cost–participation frontier (reward-scale grid λ) at the same actual expenditure per farmer, within each repetition (common random numbers), without extrapolation. Primary target: 200 MU per farmer over 12 seasons (pre-specified).

Δ horizon-mean participation (P1) at matched expenditure

Primary endpoint P1, paired difference to S0
View data table

Δ sustained participation (P2) at matched expenditure

Primary endpoint P2 (≥ 4 consecutive seasons)
View data table

Cost–participation frontiers

P1 against actual expenditure; points = reward scales λ (λ = 0 is the control)
Bands: 95% bootstrap intervals of P1 at each λ.
View data table

Cost–sustained-participation frontiers

P2 against actual expenditure
View data table

Matched-expenditure estimates (all targets)

Difference to the control at equal expenditure · [95% interval] · repetitions in which the target lies within the observed spending range.
Target (MU / farmer)MechanismP1 at targetΔ P1 vs S0Δ P2 vs S0Net additional seasons / farmerAvailability
100 S1 Fixed 31.2%
[30.0%, 32.5%]
+7.5 pp
[+7.0 pp, +8.0 pp]
+9.6 pp
[+8.5 pp, +10.8 pp]
0.902 Available (20/20)
100 S2 Performance-based 31.0%
[29.7%, 32.3%]
+7.3 pp
[+6.8 pp, +7.9 pp]
+10.0 pp
[+8.9 pp, +11.3 pp]
0.877 Available (20/20)
100 S3 Tiered 30.8%
[29.3%, 32.2%]
+7.0 pp
[+6.6 pp, +7.5 pp]
+9.8 pp
[+8.7 pp, +10.9 pp]
0.846 Available (20/20)
100 S3R Tiered, relative 30.9%
[29.5%, 32.2%]
+7.1 pp
[+6.7 pp, +7.6 pp]
+9.9 pp
[+8.8 pp, +11.1 pp]
0.858 Available (20/20)
200 · primary S1 Fixed 37.0%
[35.9%, 38.0%]
+13.3 pp
[+12.5 pp, +14.0 pp]
+17.0 pp
[+14.8 pp, +19.1 pp]
1.594 Available (20/20)
200 · primary S2 Performance-based 36.2%
[35.0%, 37.4%]
+12.5 pp
[+11.7 pp, +13.1 pp]
+16.7 pp
[+15.0 pp, +18.4 pp]
1.496 Available (20/20)
200 · primary S3 Tiered 35.7%
[34.2%, 37.1%]
+12.0 pp
[+11.3 pp, +12.6 pp]
+16.1 pp
[+14.4 pp, +17.6 pp]
1.436 Available (20/20)
200 · primary S3R Tiered, relative 36.2%
[34.8%, 37.5%]
+12.4 pp
[+11.7 pp, +13.1 pp]
+16.5 pp
[+14.8 pp, +18.0 pp]
1.492 Available (20/20)
300 S1 Fixed 41.8%
[40.8%, 42.9%]
+18.1 pp
[+17.1 pp, +19.0 pp]
+22.9 pp
[+20.1 pp, +25.5 pp]
2.170 Available (20/20)
300 S2 Performance-based 40.7%
[39.4%, 41.9%]
+16.9 pp
[+16.0 pp, +17.9 pp]
+22.5 pp
[+20.3 pp, +24.6 pp]
2.034 Available (20/20)
300 S3 Tiered 39.5%
[38.2%, 40.7%]
+15.8 pp
[+15.0 pp, +16.6 pp]
+20.9 pp
[+18.8 pp, +22.6 pp]
1.892 Available (20/20)
300 S3R Tiered, relative 40.1%
[39.0%, 41.3%]
+16.4 pp
[+15.6 pp, +17.2 pp]
+21.7 pp
[+19.7 pp, +23.5 pp]
1.971 Available (20/20)
400 S1 Fixed 46.0%
[45.0%, 47.0%]
+22.3 pp
[+21.2 pp, +23.4 pp]
+28.1 pp
[+25.2 pp, +30.9 pp]
2.680 Available (20/20)
400 S2 Performance-based 44.3%
[43.2%, 45.4%]
+20.6 pp
[+19.5 pp, +21.7 pp]
+27.0 pp
[+24.8 pp, +29.3 pp]
2.475 Available (20/20)
400 S3 Tiered 42.9%
[41.6%, 44.2%]
+19.2 pp
[+18.3 pp, +20.2 pp]
+25.1 pp
[+23.0 pp, +27.1 pp]
2.308 Available (20/20)
400 S3R Tiered, relative 43.6%
[42.5%, 44.9%]
+19.9 pp
[+19.0 pp, +20.9 pp]
+26.3 pp
[+24.3 pp, +28.4 pp]
2.390 Available (20/20)

Pairwise differences at the primary target (200 MU)

Effect sizes with 95% Monte Carlo intervals; "share A > B" is the fraction of repetitions in which A exceeds B. These describe the model, not statistical superiority of real programmes.
A − BΔ P1share A > BΔ P2share A > B
S1 Fixed − S2 Performance-based +0.8 pp
[+0.5 pp, +1.1 pp]
95 % +0.2 pp
[-0.7 pp, +1.2 pp]
40 %
S1 Fixed − S3 Tiered +1.3 pp
[+0.8 pp, +1.8 pp]
95 % +0.9 pp
[-0.5 pp, +2.2 pp]
65 %
S1 Fixed − S3R Tiered, relative +0.8 pp
[+0.5 pp, +1.2 pp]
85 % +0.4 pp
[-0.4 pp, +1.3 pp]
45 %
S2 Performance-based − S3 Tiered +0.5 pp
[+0.1 pp, +0.9 pp]
65 % +0.6 pp
[-0.1 pp, +1.4 pp]
50 %
S2 Performance-based − S3R Tiered, relative +0.0 pp
[-0.2 pp, +0.3 pp]
45 % +0.2 pp
[-0.2 pp, +0.6 pp]
45 %
S3 Tiered − S3R Tiered, relative -0.5 pp
[-0.8 pp, -0.1 pp]
30 % -0.4 pp
[-1.3 pp, +0.5 pp]
40 %

Outcomes at reward scale λ = 1 · not expenditure-matched

At a common λ, mechanisms spend different amounts (see actual expenditure). Differences here confound mechanism design with spending level; use the matched comparison above for mechanism contrasts.

Horizon-mean participation (P1)

Primary endpoint
View data table

Sustained participation (P2)

≥ 4 consecutive seasons
View data table

Actual expenditure per farmer

MU over the horizon (after any rationing)
View data table

Participation over seasons

Per-season participation share
View data table

Continuation probability

P(participate in t | participated in t−1)
View data table

Dis-adoption by season

Share of farmers stopping in each season
View data table

Deadweight share of payments

Payments in farmer-seasons that also participate in the paired control (synthetic counterfactual)
View data table

Cost-effectiveness at λ = 1

Primary estimator: pooled ratio Σ expenditure / Σ net additional participant-seasons across repetitions, with 95% bootstrap interval. The per-run mean of ratios is secondary (metric table below).
MechanismPooled cost per additional participant-season95% intervalActual expenditure / farmerBudget utilisation
S1 Fixed 173.9 MU [167.7 MU, 180.8 MU] 669.9 MU n/a (uncapped)
S2 Performance-based 166.0 MU [157.3 MU, 175.6 MU] 429.6 MU n/a (uncapped)
S3 Tiered 196.0 MU [187.7 MU, 204.6 MU] 570.5 MU n/a (uncapped)
S3R Tiered, relative 185.4 MU [176.9 MU, 194.9 MU] 536.1 MU n/a (uncapped)

Distribution, equity and additionality

Payments by baseline ground-cover tercile

Share of all payments received by each tercile of q0
Under absolute thresholds (S3) high-baseline farmers can be paid without improving.
View data table

Reward parity profile

Mean entitlement after k consecutive seasons (reference population, λ = 1)
Analytic diagnostic, not a simulation outcome: S1 pays its full reward from season 1, accumulation-based mechanisms only later.
View data table

Subgroup outcomes at λ = 1

Terciles of baseline ground cover q0 and of adoption cost C (within each repetition). Net position = payments − practice costs incurred (MU per farmer over the horizon; non-monetary benefits excluded).
Subgroup S0 No incentive S1 Fixed S2 Performance-based S3 Tiered S3R Tiered, relative
Baseline cover · low
participation · payment share · net position
22.8%
no payments · -194.5 MU
55.3%
32.8% · 162.3 MU
43.6%
31.0% · 15.0 MU
32.2%
10.5% · -97.8 MU
45.6%
30.8% · 90.7 MU
Baseline cover · middle
participation · payment share · net position
23.5%
no payments · -209.1 MU
56.8%
33.6% · 150.7 MU
47.4%
35.8% · 28.1 MU
50.6%
34.3% · 124.0 MU
50.6%
36.3% · 117.7 MU
Baseline cover · high
participation · payment share · net position
24.8%
no payments · -213.3 MU
55.3%
33.6% · 169.8 MU
45.0%
33.2% · 27.1 MU
60.7%
55.2% · 379.1 MU
47.2%
33.0% · 104.5 MU
Adoption cost · low
participation · payment share · net position
31.7%
no payments · -193.3 MU
64.4%
38.1% · 372.8 MU
54.5%
40.0% · 184.1 MU
57.0%
39.0% · 321.3 MU
56.3%
38.6% · 278.9 MU
Adoption cost · middle
participation · payment share · net position
23.4%
no payments · -221.0 MU
56.3%
33.3% · 143.2 MU
46.1%
33.7% · 3.4 MU
48.2%
32.5% · 109.3 MU
49.2%
33.9% · 87.9 MU
Adoption cost · high
participation · payment share · net position
16.3%
no payments · -202.9 MU
47.0%
28.6% · -27.3 MU
35.5%
26.3% · -113.2 MU
39.0%
28.6% · -13.4 MU
38.2%
27.5% · -49.4 MU

All metrics at λ = 1 — mean [95% bootstrap interval]

Primary endpoints are marked. n/a = undefined in every repetition; "undef." counts excluded repetitions.
Metric S0 No incentive S1 Fixed S2 Performance-based S3 Tiered S3R Tiered, relative
Participation
Horizon-mean participation (P1) primary
share of farmers (0–1)
23.7%
[22.1%, 25.3%]
55.8%
[54.4%, 57.3%]
45.3%
[43.3%, 47.1%]
48.0%
[46.1%, 49.7%]
47.8%
[45.9%, 49.7%]
Δ horizon-mean participation vs control primary
percentage points
n/a +32.1 pp
[+30.9 pp, +33.3 pp]
+21.6 pp
[+20.4 pp, +22.8 pp]
+24.3 pp
[+23.1 pp, +25.4 pp]
+24.1 pp
[+22.7 pp, +25.5 pp]
Initial participation (season 1)
share of farmers (0–1)
17.3%
[15.6%, 18.8%]
39.3%
[37.3%, 41.3%]
28.2%
[26.1%, 30.4%]
30.7%
[28.5%, 32.8%]
29.3%
[27.4%, 31.3%]
Final-season participation
share of farmers (0–1)
24.6%
[22.0%, 27.4%]
58.0%
[55.5%, 60.7%]
48.7%
[46.0%, 51.7%]
51.8%
[49.0%, 54.5%]
51.9%
[49.6%, 54.1%]
Ever participated
share of farmers (0–1)
68.1%
[65.9%, 70.2%]
91.4%
[90.5%, 92.3%]
81.9%
[79.9%, 83.8%]
81.9%
[80.2%, 83.5%]
81.2%
[79.4%, 83.0%]
Sustained participation
Sustained participation (P2) primary
share of farmers (0–1)
23.7%
[20.9%, 26.0%]
63.8%
[61.6%, 65.8%]
51.6%
[49.3%, 54.0%]
54.2%
[51.6%, 56.7%]
55.1%
[52.6%, 57.8%]
Δ sustained participation vs control primary
percentage points
n/a +40.2 pp
[+37.7 pp, +42.5 pp]
+27.9 pp
[+25.3 pp, +30.2 pp]
+30.6 pp
[+28.3 pp, +32.5 pp]
+31.4 pp
[+29.1 pp, +33.9 pp]
Continuation probability
probability (0–1)
68.3%
[66.1%, 70.5%]
84.9%
[84.0%, 85.7%]
84.3%
[83.0%, 85.4%]
86.6%
[85.5%, 87.6%]
86.5%
[85.5%, 87.5%]
Dis-adoption rate
probability (0–1)
31.7%
[29.7%, 33.8%]
15.1%
[14.3%, 16.0%]
15.7%
[14.7%, 16.9%]
13.4%
[12.4%, 14.6%]
13.5%
[12.6%, 14.5%]
Mean consecutive participation duration
seasons
2.7
[2.6, 2.8]
4.5
[4.3, 4.6]
4.3
[4.2, 4.5]
4.8
[4.6, 4.9]
4.7
[4.5, 4.9]
Participated in every season
share of farmers (0–1)
1.7%
[1.1%, 2.3%]
13.3%
[11.4%, 15.2%]
9.8%
[8.2%, 11.4%]
12.9%
[10.8%, 15.2%]
11.6%
[9.7%, 13.3%]
Re-adopters
share of farmers (0–1)
29.3%
[27.5%, 31.1%]
45.9%
[44.1%, 47.7%]
35.7%
[34.0%, 37.3%]
33.0%
[31.2%, 34.6%]
33.5%
[32.0%, 35.1%]
Re-adoption frequency
events per farmer
0.4
[0.4, 0.4]
0.6
[0.6, 0.6]
0.4
[0.4, 0.5]
0.4
[0.4, 0.4]
0.4
[0.4, 0.4]
Spending & cost-effectiveness
Actual expenditure per farmer
MU per farmer over the horizon
0.0 MU
[0.0 MU, 0.0 MU]
669.9 MU
[652.0 MU, 686.5 MU]
429.6 MU
[409.2 MU, 450.3 MU]
570.5 MU
[541.7 MU, 598.8 MU]
536.1 MU
[512.4 MU, 560.2 MU]
Total expenditure
MU
0.0 MU
[0.0 MU, 0.0 MU]
66,985.0 MU
[65,304.5 MU, 68,775.1 MU]
42,957.1 MU
[40,691.2 MU, 45,158.3 MU]
57,050.0 MU
[54,192.3 MU, 59,806.6 MU]
53,612.5 MU
[51,210.0 MU, 56,055.4 MU]
Budget utilisation
share of nominal budget (0–1)
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Cost per additional participant-season (per-run ratio)
MU per participant-season
n/a 174.9 MU
[168.2 MU, 181.8 MU]
167.7 MU
[157.0 MU, 178.3 MU]
197.0 MU
[187.7 MU, 206.7 MU]
187.4 MU
[177.6 MU, 197.9 MU]
Additionality (synthetic counterfactual)
Net additional participant-seasons
farmer-seasons
n/a 385.3
[369.7, 399.1]
258.9
[244.4, 273.6]
291.0
[276.8, 305.5]
289.1
[273.3, 307.1]
Gross additional participant-seasons
farmer-seasons
n/a 385.3
[370.2, 399.9]
258.9
[243.3, 273.5]
291.0
[277.5, 304.1]
289.1
[272.0, 306.9]
Displaced participant-seasons
farmer-seasons
n/a 0.0
[0.0, 0.0]
0.0
[0.0, 0.0]
0.0
[0.0, 0.0]
0.0
[0.0, 0.0]
Deadweight share of payments
share of expenditure (0–1)
n/a 42.4%
[40.2%, 44.7%]
49.6%
[46.8%, 52.0%]
41.8%
[39.1%, 44.4%]
45.2%
[42.5%, 48.0%]
Deadweight payments
MU
n/a 28,460.0 MU
[26,634.6 MU, 30,275.6 MU]
21,383.0 MU
[19,637.9 MU, 22,972.8 MU]
24,032.5 MU
[21,713.6 MU, 26,499.1 MU]
24,332.5 MU
[22,315.0 MU, 26,258.2 MU]
Distribution & equity
Payment Gini (all farmers)
index (0–1)
n/a 0.337
[0.325, 0.350]
0.549
[0.533, 0.565]
0.576
[0.559, 0.595]
0.553
[0.536, 0.569]
Payment Gini (recipients)
index (0–1)
n/a 0.275
[0.263, 0.286]
0.449
[0.434, 0.463]
0.383
[0.367, 0.398]
0.400
[0.386, 0.415]
Share of farmers paid
share of farmers (0–1)
0.0%
[0.0%, 0.0%]
91.4%
[90.5%, 92.3%]
81.9%
[80.0%, 83.8%]
68.6%
[66.8%, 70.4%]
74.5%
[72.5%, 76.5%]
Net financial position of participants
MU per farmer over the horizon
-301.6 MU
[-316.3 MU, -287.0 MU]
176.5 MU
[161.7 MU, 192.3 MU]
28.6 MU
[12.7 MU, 44.0 MU]
168.4 MU
[145.7 MU, 192.9 MU]
128.3 MU
[108.8 MU, 145.6 MU]
Participants with non-negative net financial position
share of participants (0–1)
0.0%
[0.0%, 0.0%]
80.5%
[78.7%, 82.3%]
39.1%
[36.2%, 41.8%]
53.6%
[51.4%, 56.2%]
51.4%
[48.9%, 53.8%]
Payments to farmers already above the lowest S3 threshold at baseline
share of expenditure (0–1)
n/a 14.9%
[12.8%, 17.0%]
14.6%
[12.3%, 17.0%]
28.5%
[25.4%, 31.8%]
14.6%
[12.0%, 17.1%]
Ground cover
Mean ground-cover gain
ground-cover fraction
0.084
[0.078, 0.089]
0.185
[0.178, 0.191]
0.163
[0.156, 0.170]
0.172
[0.164, 0.178]
0.175
[0.169, 0.183]